In this post you get answer of the follwoing question :
Laissez-faire leadership style. Write a 625 word paper, describing laissez-faire leadership style.
Develop a matrix with the leadership style, covering the pros and cons of the leadership style.
Performance Evaluation and Leadership Example Matrix."
Laissez-faire leadership style. Write a 625 word paper, describing laissez-faire leadership style.
Develop a matrix with the leadership style, covering the pros and cons of the leadership style.
Performance Evaluation and Leadership Example Matrix."
Leadership Style
|
Description of Leadership Style
|
Pros of Leadership Style
|
Cons of Leadership Style
|
(Example)
Transformational Leadership
|
|
|
|
Laissez-faire
Leadership Style
Laissez-faire leadership refers to
the behavior through which leader allows team members to take decision on own. It’s like a delegation of
authority from the leader to individuals. It is the style where leader develops
trust and healthy relationship with team members. Leaders with this style give
minimum guidance to subordinates and believe to control less to achieve natural
objectives. It is believed that people work more effectively when they are left
alone to respond to their responsibilities and obligations with their own ways
(Northouse, b2011).
Pros and Cons of Laissez-Faire
Leadership
Laissez-faire leadership is quite
effective in the situation where the project or plan includes highly skilled
people. The people with enough motivation and capability can work under this
type of leadership more effectively. It is free approach that provides
environment to think and do without any fear. On the other hand, this leadership style is
not applicable in situations where people are with lack of knowledge or
experience for the completion of any task (Northouse, 2011). If any leader
applies laissez-faire leadership with such team member then the project will
surely go off-the track and deadline can be missed as well.
Leadership Styles Matrix
Leadership Style
|
Description of
Leadership Style
|
Pros of Leadership
Style
|
Cons of Leadership
Style
|
Transformational Leadership
|
Leadership style in which leader is more devoted
towards followers to give and take best output from both of sides (Bertocci,
2009).
|
This leadership model creates an enthusiastic
working environment which develops self motivation among followers. Through
such self motivation some followers will become future leaders.
|
This leadership style is totally based on leader’s
characteristics which can sometimes develop a risky situation in success of the
plan.
|
Transactional Leadership
|
This type of leaders focuses on followers’
motivation with rewards or punishments.
|
This method is best to motivate team members towards
a particular part of the work.
|
In this method, followers only do whatever leader
say which stops their thinning out of the box (Ricketson, 2008).
|
Autocratic Leadership
|
This is the traditional form of leadership in which
all power to take decisions in the part of the leader. There is very little
room for followers’ suggestion on any topic.
|
At the time of stress, Autocratic leadership is the
most suitable way to face. This leadership style is used by the military and other
urgent circumstances.
|
This leadership style consists one way communication which
becomes frustrated for followers. Also, it develops the environment of fear
for followers which are quite negative aspect (Hood, 2007).
|
Bureaucratic Leadership
|
It is the style that works with some guidelines or
rules. Leaders in this style wants that their followers must follow the rules
that is prescribed in book of management.
|
This style is used in risky situations or where
large sums of money are involved. Also, it is effective style where routine
work is involved such as manufacturing.
|
The drawback of this style if that it is ineffective
in organizations where people work with flexibility, innovation and creativity
(Gray, 2004).
|
Charismatic Leadership
|
It is a leadership style in which leaders are work of
enthusiast people. It is quite similar in transformational style. But, charismatic
leaders focus on themselves and don’t want to make any change in process.
|
This leadership contains great responsibility and includes
a long term commitment from leaders.
|
In this leadership style, leader more believes in
themselves which can develop a problematic situation if leader leave the
project or organization (Sousa, 2003).
|
Democratic/Participative Leadership
|
It is the most communicative form of leadership in which
leaders give importance to team members’ ideas and suggestion. But, the last
decision is taken by the leader only.
|
This type of leadership style facilitates highly
productive workforce with provision of job satisfaction. It also helps to develop team members’ skill
with the involvement in the decision making process.
|
Due to involvement of all team members, the process of
decision making takes huge time which can affect the whole plan quite
effectively (Rothwell, 2011).
|
Task-Oriented Leadership
|
These leaders are focused on getting the job done with the
assessment of proper structure in place, organize, and monitor work.
|
Task-orientation style of leader facilitates timely work
done by the team because team member may become lean sometimes at the
workplace.
|
These leaders don’t think of team members’ skill or
personal development which may develop a feeling of dissatisfaction among team
members (Arnold, 2008).
|
References
Arnold,
G.E. (2008). Examining the Relationship
Between Leadership Style and Project Success in Virtual Projects. USA:
ProQuest.
Bertocci,
D.I. (2009). Leadership in Organizations:
There is a Difference Between Leaders and Managers. USA: University Press
of America.
Gray,
D. (2004). Public Services (uniformed).
Heinemann.
Hood,
J.D. (2007). Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles: An
Exploratory Investigation of Traditional and Nontraditional Student
Perceptions. USA: ProQuest.
Northouse,
P.G. (2011). Introduction to Leadership:
Concepts and Practice. London: SAGE.
Ricketson,
R.S. (2008). An Exploration of the
Relationship of Leadership Styles and Dimensions of Courageous Followership.
USA: ProQuest.
Rothwell,
J.D. (2011). In Mixed Company:
Communicating in Small Groups, 8th ed.: Communicating in Small Groups and Teams.
USA: Cengage Learning.
Sousa,
D.A. (2003). The Leadership Brain: How to
Lead Today's Schools More Effectively. Corwin Press.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please do not use spam comments and do not use these words like thanks, nice etc. Do not use keyword as a name.